The journal applies the following peer review policies:

1. Each submitted manuscript will be reviewed by at least two reviewers.
2. The identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential (double-blind review method).
3. The review process considers the following aspects:
   a. Ethics: Authors must ensure compliance with research and publication ethics.
   b. Relevance to the journal’s scope.
   c. Novelty, objectivity, and scientific impact.
   d. Theoretical Framework: Clearly presented and well explained.
   e. Problem Statement: Clearly defined and explained.
   f. Research Questions: Clearly formulated.
   g. Research Methods: Appropriate and clearly described.
   h. Results: Adequately presented, clearly explained, and properly discussed.
4. Reviewers provide one of the following recommendations:
   a. Accept
   b. Minor revisions required
   c. Major revisions required
   d. Reject
5. In cases of conflicting recommendations, additional reviewers may be assigned. The final decision is made by the Editor in Chief.
6. The editorial board reserves the right to make editorial revisions to website content and submitted manuscripts.