The journal applies the following peer review policies:

1. Every submitted manuscript will be reviewed by at least two peer reviewers.
2. The journal implements a double-blind peer review process, in which reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers.
3. The review process considers the following aspects:

a. Ethics: The manuscript complies with research and publication ethics.
b. Relevance: The manuscript is relevant to the focus and scope of the journal.
c. Novelty, objectivity, and scientific contribution.
d. Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework is clearly presented and explained.
e. Problem Statement: The problem statement is clearly formulated and explained.
f. Research Question: The research question is clearly presented.
g. Research Methods: The research methods are appropriate and clearly described.
h. Results and Discussion: The findings are adequately presented, clearly explained, and properly discussed.

4. Reviewers will provide one of the following recommendations:

a. Accept
b. Minor Revision
c. Major Revision
d. Reject

5. If reviewers provide contradictory recommendations, an additional reviewer may be assigned. The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief.
6. The editorial team reserves the right to make editorial amendments related to the content of the journal website and submitted manuscripts.