Every submitted manuscript will be reviewed by at least two peer reviewers.
The journal applies a double-blind review process in which reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers.
The review process considers the following aspects: a. Compliance with research and publication ethics. b. Relevance to the journal’s focus and scope. c. Novelty, objectivity, and scientific contribution. d. Clarity and appropriateness of the theoretical framework. e. Clarity of the problem statement. f. Clarity of the research questions or objectives. g. Appropriateness and clarity of the research methods. h. Adequacy, clarity, and discussion of the research results.
Based on the review results, reviewers may recommend one of the following decisions: a. Accept b. Minor Revision c. Major Revision d. Reject
If reviewers provide contradictory recommendations, an additional reviewer may be assigned. The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance is made by the Editor-in-Chief.
The editorial team reserves the right to make editorial amendments related to the content of the journal website and submitted manuscripts when necessary.
